comparison old versus New evidence law plane text for WhatsApp

📘 Comparison — Old vs New Evidence Law (Plain Text for WhatsApp)


---

Old Law:
Indian Evidence Act, 1872

New Law:
Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
(Enforced from 1 July 2024)


---

Purpose:
To modernize India’s justice system and give full legal recognition to digital and electronic evidence like emails, CCTV, chats, and data records.


---

Main Changes (clear and direct):

1️⃣ The new Act completely replaces the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
2️⃣ New Name: “Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023”.
3️⃣ Old Act had 167 sections; the new one has 170 sections.
4️⃣ Digital and electronic records are now recognized as primary evidence.
5️⃣ The old Section 65B (Electronic Records) is now merged into Sections 61 to 63 of the new Act.
6️⃣ All digital materials — mobile chats, emails, CCTV footage, pen drives, server logs, etc. — are now fully admissible in court.
7️⃣ The language of the Act is simpler, Indianized, and clearer.
8️⃣ Colonial (British-era) terms have been removed.
9️⃣ Equal importance is now given to oral, documentary, and electronic evidence.
10️⃣ The definition of “evidence” is expanded — digital footprints are also included.


---

Other Two New Criminal Laws Introduced Together:
1️⃣ Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — replaces the old Indian Penal Code (IPC).
2️⃣ Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — replaces the old Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).


---

In Simple Words:
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is no longer in force.
It is now replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023,
effective from 1 July 2024 across India.


---

Goal:
To make India’s justice system transparent, faster, and suitable for the digital era by legally recognizing modern forms of evidence.


---

📅 Summary:
Old law – Indian Evidence Act, 1872
New law – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Effective date – 1 July 2024


--

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GOVT JOB OR PRIVATE JOB

Image
Lokayukta raid in Karnataka , where a former clerk, Kalakappa Nidagundi, from the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL) was found to possess assets significantly disproportionate to his known income.  Here's a summary of the findings: Disproportionate Assets: Despite a modest monthly salary of ₹15,000, Nidagundi, a former daily-wage clerk in Koppal, was found to own assets worth over ₹30 crore during a Lokayukta raid. Seized Properties: The raid unearthed a vast amount of property including 24 residential houses, four plots, and 40 acres of agricultural land, registered in his name and those of his wife and brother. Other Valuables: Officials also seized 350 grams of gold, 1.5 kilograms of silver ornaments, and four vehicles (two cars and two two-wheelers) from his residence. Allegations of Fraud: Nidagundi, along with a former KRIDL engineer ZM Chincholkar, is accused of orchestrating a ₹72 crore scam by creating fake documents and bills for 96 incomplete infr...
Read more

That Res-judicata is a mixed question of law & fact and hence it cannot be decided as a preliminary issue under order XIV Rule 2 (2) of CPC.

Image
 *Headnotes*  - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XIV Rule 2 - The plea of res judicata in appropriate cases may be determined as preliminary issue when it is neither a disputed question of fact nor a mixed question of law and fact - Preliminary issues can be those where no evidence is required and on the basis of reading of the plaint or the applicable law, if the jurisdiction of the Court or the bar to the suit is made out, the Court may decide such issues with the sole objective for the expeditious decision. [Referred to Ramesh B. Desai and Ors. v. Bipin Vadilal Mehta and Ors (2006) 5 SCC 638 ] (Para 20, 30) - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XIV Rule 2 , Order XX Rule 5, Order XLI Rules 24 & 25- To avoid the possibility of remanding back the matter after the decision on the preliminary issues, it is mandated for the trial court under Order XIV Rule 2 and Order XX Rule 5, and for the first appellate court in terms of Order XLI Rules 24 and 25 to rec...
Read more

How to become advocate on record complete procedure

Image
How to become advocate on the record complete procedure To become an **Advocate on Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India**, one must meet specific qualifications, undergo mandatory training, pass the AOR Examination, and fulfill a set of procedural requirements[1][2][3]. ## Eligibility Criteria - **Enrolment as Advocate:** Must be enrolled with any State Bar Council and be a practicing advocate[1][4][2]. - **Experience:** A minimum of 4 years of continuous practice is required before starting AOR training; total experience should be at least five years before applying for AOR status[1][2]. - **Training:** Must complete 1 year of training under a designated Advocate on Record after completing four years of practice[1][2][3]. ## Training Requirements - The candidate must work under an existing AOR for one year, learning Supreme Court procedures and practices[1][2][3]. - At the end of training, obtain a certificate from the AOR mentor[5]. ## Application and Examination Process - **Ap...
Read more