SUPREME COURT SIGNIFICANT JUDGEMENT

*Ashok Dhankad vs. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.*

*Significant Judgment by the Supreme Court*

The Supreme Court has laid down important principles regarding appeals against bail orders. Here are some key points:

*Key Principles*

- *Appeal vs. Cancellation*: An appeal against a bail order and a bail cancellation application are distinct, with different parameters applying to both.
- *Evidence Analysis*: Courts should not conduct an in-depth analysis of evidence when considering bail appeals, as the merits of evidence are not decided at this stage.
- *Bail Order Requirements*: A bail order must reflect the court's discretion and assessment of relevant factors, such as:
    - *Gravity of Offense*: The seriousness of the alleged crime.
    - *Role of Accused*: The accused's involvement in the crime.
- *Grounds for Appeal*: An appeal against bail can be entertained on the following grounds:
    - *Perversity*: The bail order is flawed or unreasonable.
    - *Illegality*: The order violates the law.
    - *Inconsistency with Law*: The order does not follow legal principles.
    - *Ignoring Relevant Factors*: The court did not consider important factors.
- *Conduct After Bail*: The accused's behavior after being granted bail cannot be a ground for appeal against the bail order.
- *No Retaliation*: An appeal against a bail order should not be used as a retaliatory measure.

*Conclusion*

These principles aim to ensure that bail decisions are made fairly and consistently, considering the rights of both the accused and the prosecution. By setting clear guidelines, the Supreme Court promotes transparency in the judicial process and prevents misuse of the bail system.

*Case Details*

- *Case Number*: Criminal Appeal No. 3495 of 2025
- *Judge*: Justice Sanjay Karol
- *Date of Judgment*: August 13, 2025
- *Court*: Supreme Court of India [1]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GOVT JOB OR PRIVATE JOB

Image
Lokayukta raid in Karnataka , where a former clerk, Kalakappa Nidagundi, from the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL) was found to possess assets significantly disproportionate to his known income.  Here's a summary of the findings: Disproportionate Assets: Despite a modest monthly salary of ₹15,000, Nidagundi, a former daily-wage clerk in Koppal, was found to own assets worth over ₹30 crore during a Lokayukta raid. Seized Properties: The raid unearthed a vast amount of property including 24 residential houses, four plots, and 40 acres of agricultural land, registered in his name and those of his wife and brother. Other Valuables: Officials also seized 350 grams of gold, 1.5 kilograms of silver ornaments, and four vehicles (two cars and two two-wheelers) from his residence. Allegations of Fraud: Nidagundi, along with a former KRIDL engineer ZM Chincholkar, is accused of orchestrating a ₹72 crore scam by creating fake documents and bills for 96 incomplete infr...
Read more

That Res-judicata is a mixed question of law & fact and hence it cannot be decided as a preliminary issue under order XIV Rule 2 (2) of CPC.

Image
 *Headnotes*  - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XIV Rule 2 - The plea of res judicata in appropriate cases may be determined as preliminary issue when it is neither a disputed question of fact nor a mixed question of law and fact - Preliminary issues can be those where no evidence is required and on the basis of reading of the plaint or the applicable law, if the jurisdiction of the Court or the bar to the suit is made out, the Court may decide such issues with the sole objective for the expeditious decision. [Referred to Ramesh B. Desai and Ors. v. Bipin Vadilal Mehta and Ors (2006) 5 SCC 638 ] (Para 20, 30) - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XIV Rule 2 , Order XX Rule 5, Order XLI Rules 24 & 25- To avoid the possibility of remanding back the matter after the decision on the preliminary issues, it is mandated for the trial court under Order XIV Rule 2 and Order XX Rule 5, and for the first appellate court in terms of Order XLI Rules 24 and 25 to rec...
Read more

How to become advocate on record complete procedure

Image
How to become advocate on the record complete procedure To become an **Advocate on Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India**, one must meet specific qualifications, undergo mandatory training, pass the AOR Examination, and fulfill a set of procedural requirements[1][2][3]. ## Eligibility Criteria - **Enrolment as Advocate:** Must be enrolled with any State Bar Council and be a practicing advocate[1][4][2]. - **Experience:** A minimum of 4 years of continuous practice is required before starting AOR training; total experience should be at least five years before applying for AOR status[1][2]. - **Training:** Must complete 1 year of training under a designated Advocate on Record after completing four years of practice[1][2][3]. ## Training Requirements - The candidate must work under an existing AOR for one year, learning Supreme Court procedures and practices[1][2][3]. - At the end of training, obtain a certificate from the AOR mentor[5]. ## Application and Examination Process - **Ap...
Read more