Supreme Court On Grant Of Bail

*In Re Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail*

*Supreme Court Guidelines for Grant of Bail*

*Introduction*

The Supreme Court has issued a landmark judgment on the grant of bail, aiming to ensure that undertrial prisoners are released in a timely manner and their fundamental rights are protected.

*Key Guidelines*

1. Soft Copy of Bail Order
Courts shall send a soft copy of the bail order to the jail superintendent on the same day or the next day, which shall be entered in the e-prison software. This will ensure that the bail order is communicated to the jail administration promptly, facilitating the release of the prisoner.

2. Release within 7 Days
If the accused is not released within 7 days from the date of grant of bail, the jail superintendent shall inform the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), who shall assist in the release of the prisoner.

3. Socio-Economic Assessment
The Secretary, DLSA may conduct a socio-economic assessment of the accused with the help of probation officers or para-legal volunteers.

4. Interim Bail
Courts may consider granting interim bail for a specified period to enable the accused to furnish bail bonds or sureties.

5. Relaxation of Bail Bond Conditions
If the bail bonds are not furnished within one month from the date of grant of bail, the concerned court may suo moto review the case and consider relaxing the bail conditions.

6. No Local Surety
Courts shall not impose local surety conditions that may delay the release of the accused.


These guidelines aim to ensure that undertrial prisoners are released in a timely manner and their fundamental rights are protected. By streamlining the bail process and reducing unnecessary delays, the guidelines seek to promote a more efficient and just bail system.

Follow the SN_ADVOCATE channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaAMC8E6LwHp99FsM42o

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GOVT JOB OR PRIVATE JOB

Image
Lokayukta raid in Karnataka , where a former clerk, Kalakappa Nidagundi, from the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL) was found to possess assets significantly disproportionate to his known income.  Here's a summary of the findings: Disproportionate Assets: Despite a modest monthly salary of ₹15,000, Nidagundi, a former daily-wage clerk in Koppal, was found to own assets worth over ₹30 crore during a Lokayukta raid. Seized Properties: The raid unearthed a vast amount of property including 24 residential houses, four plots, and 40 acres of agricultural land, registered in his name and those of his wife and brother. Other Valuables: Officials also seized 350 grams of gold, 1.5 kilograms of silver ornaments, and four vehicles (two cars and two two-wheelers) from his residence. Allegations of Fraud: Nidagundi, along with a former KRIDL engineer ZM Chincholkar, is accused of orchestrating a ₹72 crore scam by creating fake documents and bills for 96 incomplete infr...
Read more

That Res-judicata is a mixed question of law & fact and hence it cannot be decided as a preliminary issue under order XIV Rule 2 (2) of CPC.

Image
 *Headnotes*  - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XIV Rule 2 - The plea of res judicata in appropriate cases may be determined as preliminary issue when it is neither a disputed question of fact nor a mixed question of law and fact - Preliminary issues can be those where no evidence is required and on the basis of reading of the plaint or the applicable law, if the jurisdiction of the Court or the bar to the suit is made out, the Court may decide such issues with the sole objective for the expeditious decision. [Referred to Ramesh B. Desai and Ors. v. Bipin Vadilal Mehta and Ors (2006) 5 SCC 638 ] (Para 20, 30) - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XIV Rule 2 , Order XX Rule 5, Order XLI Rules 24 & 25- To avoid the possibility of remanding back the matter after the decision on the preliminary issues, it is mandated for the trial court under Order XIV Rule 2 and Order XX Rule 5, and for the first appellate court in terms of Order XLI Rules 24 and 25 to rec...
Read more

How to become advocate on record complete procedure

Image
How to become advocate on the record complete procedure To become an **Advocate on Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India**, one must meet specific qualifications, undergo mandatory training, pass the AOR Examination, and fulfill a set of procedural requirements[1][2][3]. ## Eligibility Criteria - **Enrolment as Advocate:** Must be enrolled with any State Bar Council and be a practicing advocate[1][4][2]. - **Experience:** A minimum of 4 years of continuous practice is required before starting AOR training; total experience should be at least five years before applying for AOR status[1][2]. - **Training:** Must complete 1 year of training under a designated Advocate on Record after completing four years of practice[1][2][3]. ## Training Requirements - The candidate must work under an existing AOR for one year, learning Supreme Court procedures and practices[1][2][3]. - At the end of training, obtain a certificate from the AOR mentor[5]. ## Application and Examination Process - **Ap...
Read more