Indian Constitution & Right To Justice

*Indian Constitution and Right to Justice*

*Articles 14 to 21 of the Indian Constitution*
Articles 14 to 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantee the rights to equality, freedom, and justice. These articles state that all citizens have the right to justice, regardless of their caste, religion, gender, or economic status.

*Article 14: Right to Equality*

Article 14 states that all persons in India are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law.

*Article 21: Protection of Life and Personal Liberty*

Article 21 states that no person shall be deprived of their life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

*Landmark Judgments of the Supreme Court*

The Supreme Court has strengthened the right to justice through several landmark judgments. In one notable judgment, the Supreme Court held that the right to justice is a fundamental right and it is the duty of the state to ensure that all citizens receive justice.

*Case Law:*

- *Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (AIR 1978 SC 597)*: In this case, the Supreme Court held that the right to justice is a fundamental right and it is the duty of the state to ensure that all citizens receive justice.
- *Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala (AIR 1973 SC 1461)*: In this case, the Supreme Court held that the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be altered and the right to justice is a fundamental right.

*Right to Justice: A Fundamental Right*

The right to justice is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. This right ensures that all citizens receive equal and fair justice.

*Conclusion*

According to the Indian Constitution and the judgments of the Supreme Court, the right to justice is a fundamental right that guarantees equal and fair justice to all citizens. This right ensures that all citizens receive justice and the independence and impartiality of the judiciary are maintained.

*Key Points:*

- *Right to justice is a fundamental right.*
- *Right to equality and fair justice.*
- *Independence and impartiality of the judiciary.*
- *Duty of the state to provide justice.*
Follow the SN_ADVOCATE channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaAMC8E6LwHp99FsM42o

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GOVT JOB OR PRIVATE JOB

Image
Lokayukta raid in Karnataka , where a former clerk, Kalakappa Nidagundi, from the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL) was found to possess assets significantly disproportionate to his known income.  Here's a summary of the findings: Disproportionate Assets: Despite a modest monthly salary of ₹15,000, Nidagundi, a former daily-wage clerk in Koppal, was found to own assets worth over ₹30 crore during a Lokayukta raid. Seized Properties: The raid unearthed a vast amount of property including 24 residential houses, four plots, and 40 acres of agricultural land, registered in his name and those of his wife and brother. Other Valuables: Officials also seized 350 grams of gold, 1.5 kilograms of silver ornaments, and four vehicles (two cars and two two-wheelers) from his residence. Allegations of Fraud: Nidagundi, along with a former KRIDL engineer ZM Chincholkar, is accused of orchestrating a ₹72 crore scam by creating fake documents and bills for 96 incomplete infr...
Read more

That Res-judicata is a mixed question of law & fact and hence it cannot be decided as a preliminary issue under order XIV Rule 2 (2) of CPC.

Image
 *Headnotes*  - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XIV Rule 2 - The plea of res judicata in appropriate cases may be determined as preliminary issue when it is neither a disputed question of fact nor a mixed question of law and fact - Preliminary issues can be those where no evidence is required and on the basis of reading of the plaint or the applicable law, if the jurisdiction of the Court or the bar to the suit is made out, the Court may decide such issues with the sole objective for the expeditious decision. [Referred to Ramesh B. Desai and Ors. v. Bipin Vadilal Mehta and Ors (2006) 5 SCC 638 ] (Para 20, 30) - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XIV Rule 2 , Order XX Rule 5, Order XLI Rules 24 & 25- To avoid the possibility of remanding back the matter after the decision on the preliminary issues, it is mandated for the trial court under Order XIV Rule 2 and Order XX Rule 5, and for the first appellate court in terms of Order XLI Rules 24 and 25 to rec...
Read more

How to become advocate on record complete procedure

Image
How to become advocate on the record complete procedure To become an **Advocate on Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India**, one must meet specific qualifications, undergo mandatory training, pass the AOR Examination, and fulfill a set of procedural requirements[1][2][3]. ## Eligibility Criteria - **Enrolment as Advocate:** Must be enrolled with any State Bar Council and be a practicing advocate[1][4][2]. - **Experience:** A minimum of 4 years of continuous practice is required before starting AOR training; total experience should be at least five years before applying for AOR status[1][2]. - **Training:** Must complete 1 year of training under a designated Advocate on Record after completing four years of practice[1][2][3]. ## Training Requirements - The candidate must work under an existing AOR for one year, learning Supreme Court procedures and practices[1][2][3]. - At the end of training, obtain a certificate from the AOR mentor[5]. ## Application and Examination Process - **Ap...
Read more